Friday, March 28, 2008

Pg. 99: Nick Smith's "I Was Wrong"

The current feature at the Page 99 Test: Nick Smith's I Was Wrong: The Meanings of Apologies.

About the book, from the publisher:
Apologies can be profoundly meaningful, yet many gestures of contrition - especially those in legal contexts - appear hollow and even deceptive. Discussing numerous examples from ancient and recent history, I Was Wrong argues that we suffer from considerable confusion about the moral meanings and social functions of these complex interactions. Rather than asking whether a speech act ‘is or is not’ an apology, Smith offers a highly nuanced theory of apologetic meaning. Smith leads us though a series of rich philosophical and interdisciplinary questions, explaining how apologies have evolved from a confluence of diverse cultural and religious practices that do not translate easily into secular discourse or gender stereotypes. After classifying several varieties of apologies between individuals, Smith turns to apologies from collectives. Although apologies from corporations, governments, and other groups can be quite meaningful in certain respects, we should be suspicious of those that supplant apologies from individual wrongdoers.
Listen to Nick Smith discuss his book on The Diane Rehm Show.

Read an excerpt from I Was Wrong, and learn more about the book from the Cambridge University Press website.

Nick Smith is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of New Hampshire. Visit his faculty webpage and personal website.

The Page 99 Test: I Was Wrong.

--Marshal Zeringue