Two parts of the exchange caught my eye. First:
MM: What were the highlights of your youth?Then there's this bit that reminded me, somewhat obliquely, of Faulkner's comment about the past:
MC: You know, I had a youth that was entirely devoid of highlights. That is one of the reasons why I loved Woolf´s Mrs Dalloway. I was just a kid living in a suburb in Los Angeles, one of those places that if you drove by, you might very well glance out the window of your car and think to yourself: "Thank God I don't live there". I understood it to be magical and strange and complicated and singular, even though it looked like almost any other place in America, and when I read Mrs Dalloway and understood that somebody named Virginia Woolf had written this epic story of an ordinary day in a life of an ordinary person named Clarissa Dalloway, I thought: "Oh, I want do that! I want to try, if it's anywhere in me, to convey the strangeness and magic and off-kilter beauty of where I'm from, of the lives of the people that I know that are not full of highlights".
MM: You appear as a romantic - sensitive, extremely observant - looking down from the spires almost as a ghost observing life.Read more of the conversation.
MC: Yes, absolutely. I've always been acutely aware of the passage of time. I think of novels as doomed attempts to preserve time, to fix it and hold it and make it last - that's part of why we love novels. Take Madame Bovary - her world's still intact, in time. In the act of writing, when we reach the end of a sentence, it's already in the past. If there is no present - as we are always moving at breakneck speed into the future - then we can only write about the past. All stories are ghost stories.
--Marshal Zeringue